Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit FeedTheUSA's column >>

FEEDTHEUSA

Home Page
Hunger Fighter & 99ers Advocate
Articles Posted: 2  Links Seeded: 31
Member Since: 1/2011  Last Seen: 5/04/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Growing Number of Households Have Little in Savings or Assets, Scorecard Finds | PND | Foundation Center

Seeded on Mon Feb 6, 2012 4:52 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: Philanthropy News Digest
us-news, united-states, poverty, income, finances, savings, living-cities
Seeded by FeedTheUSA
Advertise | AdChoices

It's no wonder households have little to no savings with low wages, under-employment, rise in food and gas prices and all the rest.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • FeedTheUSA's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (26)
Heavy Artillery Rocker

Wow there's an eye opener! You win the Mr. Obvious award for today.

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:45 AM EST
sushicat

I was hoping GA was improving in some of these areas. Once again we are fighting S.C. for the worst slot.

  • 8 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 5:49 AM EST
Rodney-889389

I seeded an article last year (maybe even 2010) that asked "if you had an emergency could you come up with $2000", the answers were depressing. Very few people said they could, most didn't even have someone they could ask for that amount.

  • 9 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:14 AM EST
JEFFINVA

Kind of hard to save very much money at all these days. My wife and I do fairly well as a couple but still are strapped when it comes to having enough money to save a decent amount. I'm starting to think that the American Dream isn't so much about living a good life with a family, house and decent job but having those and still not having to work for the rest of your life.

  • 7 votes
#3.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:52 AM EST
Marshall James

I agree its hard to save that amount these days but its mainly because americans are fat and lazy and believe they are entitled to that new home and bmw like their neighbor or family member.

we have fallen for the corporations telling us that we need to have credit...carry debt...so that we can buy more.

debt is the problem here...if you had no bills it would be easy to save 2000.

so the problem is us.

  • 5 votes
#3.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:02 AM EST
ShelbyCourtland

Everyone doesn't have credit cards, whether people just didn't qualify or simply didn't want credit cards. These days, just keeping your head above water with paying the mortgage/rent, electricity/gas, phone, groceries, basic essentials like toilet tissue, cleaning supplies, thrift store shoes, etc., you get my meaning are making it hard to save.

The price of gas has gone up. Yesterday, the lowest price in my area was $3.49 a gallon. The prices at the pump and in the grocerty store a tremendous drain on finances. A head of lettuce at my local grocery store is $1.69 and I can hold it in the palm of my hand and practically wrap my fingers around it.

Not all of us are fat and lazy, nor do we feel 'entitled'. We're simply on survival mode.

First the word 'liberal' was turned into a dirty word, even a slur and now it seems everyone is claiming that we all feel 'entitled', I guess that's the next dirty word/slur coming down the pike. Give it a rest, willya?

  • 7 votes
#3.3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:35 AM EST
JEFFINVA

so the problem is us.

Speak for yourself. I work hard 6 days a week, have zero debt other than 2 car loans and a mortgage, don't have an endless amount of unnecessary bills and still have trouble saving enough to have a "nest egg" of any type, including small. To paint the entire country as fat and lazy is just an obtuse view of America these days. Hate to tell you but stagnant wages have been a problem now for about 25-30 years, it didn't just start because this generation is all fat and lazy.

Not all of us are fat and lazy, nor do we feel 'entitled'. We're simply on survival mode.

First the word 'liberal' was turned into a dirty word, even a slur and now it seems everyone is claiming that we all feel 'entitled', I guess that's the next dirty word/slur coming down the pike. Give it a rest, willya?

Exactly

  • 6 votes
#3.4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:38 AM EST
ERich-356044

Well said Shelby.

The groceries I buy haven't changed much... in fact with my daughter away at college I should see lower bills. I am not. Heads of lettuce, cuccumbers... all have tripled in price in my neighborhood. Gas has also gone up. It is crazy.

E

ps.. had a head to toe health exam a few months ago, and doc says I am not overweight either.. :) healthy body mass index etc... so don't be calling me fat either! (that comment was directed at Marshall)

  • 5 votes
#3.5 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:39 AM EST
deepwater don

Rodney... I remember that seed you did back then. General concensus was, as you said, very few could have come up with the money. Doesn't look much more optimistic now. but we can only hope.

  • 5 votes
#3.6 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:01 AM EST
sushicat

I remember that article as well. That article began my practice of "family budgeting" in one of my classes. I was astonished to learn (from them) many young adults have no clue how to get started or steer clear of financial problems.

  • 6 votes
#3.7 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:30 PM EST
Reply
doppich

Simple math. Since the gridlocked political system does not allow the fiscal thrust that is needed to reestablish a robustly growing economy, the only way for the Have-Mores to have more and more and more is for the Have-Littles to have less and less and less...

  • 7 votes
Reply#4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 6:19 AM EST
Ralph-482541

What do you think would happen when the average US wage hasn't had a net increase in thirty years. Except for the well off no one can save money and those that can are just own hospital bill away from the poor farm. But that's what Americans want, let us do our own thing and don't do any strategic planning whether individually or at the federal level and we will be fine. Good luck.

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:17 AM EST
bluearcher

Well stated.

It is the concept of "consumerism" and perpetual spending that drives the US economy.

Free market capitalism is a short term "pipe dream" that thrives within a specific country before increasing standards of living and wages forces manufacturing overseas to exploit cheap labor.

There is a Better Way

If Americans started saving at the necessary rate to promote\support a comfortable retirement then the nations economy would decline.

  • 4 votes
#5.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:32 AM EST
Thinknaboutit

If Americans started saving at the necessary rate

If peoples wages were increased to the necessary rates then perhaps saving some would be an option for more people? This "extra" money put into savings accounts or other financial vehicles would in fact bolster the economy and protect it from the short lived downturns and unemployment spikes.

  • 3 votes
#5.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:05 AM EST
Reply
Fla Pat

Our whole culture is geared to accumulating things. It is pushed thru print, radio and television. We are inundated with the idea that accumulation equals success. Accordingly the financial sector has made it far to easy to buy stuff whether you can afford it or not. Easy credit and lack of education as to what that entails for our young people accelerate the situation many now find themselves in.

Every retail place pretty much now offers instant store credit when you make basic purchases. Go in to store X for example to buy socks and underwear and you are offered a store credit card at the register - many can't say no.

The lack of family financial budgeting and planing along with a culture that encourages accumulation of bigger and better (don't worry, pay for it later) and the stagnation of wages and opportunity have got us here.

  • 3 votes
Reply#6 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 7:34 AM EST
blindsided-1194485

Tell us something we don't know. With wages stagnating or decreasing, more families are losing ground and falling out of the middle class. Many people who are underemployed, (working multiple part time jobs to make ends meet) still need government assistance in the form of food stamps to put food on the table. Not because they're lazy, not because they have no work ethic, but because they're UNDERPAID. Newt Gingrich and the GOP always seem to leave that little fact out when they bring up the subject of food stamps. Working people although they make less money, are paying more for basic necessities like food, fuel, and clothing. While the top 1% rake in more money and pay less taxes, the rest of us pay more and make less. Yet many in the GOP including their presidential candidates see nothing wrong with this.

  • 6 votes
Reply#7 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:07 AM EST
ERich-356044

What I find interesting, is that people did a study. I guess it is well and good for them to do so because Congress obviously has NO CLUE.

My husband and I do ok, but he definitely carries the financial burden more. I am a teacher with a master's degree and yet still make under what the average person with a master's degree makes due to budget cuts etc. It is hard to save when there has been no increase in my salary in 5 years now, and the price of things just keeps going up.

E

  • 4 votes
Reply#8 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:31 AM EST
ShelbyCourtland

What I find ridiculous is that we can't get through one holiday before the stores are crowding in the next one. We were in the middle of the 4th of July, when I was looking at not only Halloween displays, but Christmas displays also.

There were news stories about people camping out in parking lots of stores to be the first ones in line to pick up the latest Android smartphone, and this new gadget and that new gadget. And I'm saying to myself, where do they get all of this money to spend hundreds of dollars, even thousands on huge flat screen tvs, iphones, ipads, etc.? So, I guess those who do have credit cards are flinging them left and right.

Why do we have to have the biggest, the shiniest, the fastest, the brightest, the most expensive? If it's cheap, we don't want it. Put a big price tag on it and we flock to buy it. I've seen people whose refrigerator was so empty, it looked like it was up for sale, but they had a tv that covered an entire wall. Ridiculous!

I live within my means, shop at thrift stores, bargain hunt and I still couldn't readily come up with $2,000.00. I guess I must be doing something wrong.

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 8:49 AM EST
Halifax Oliver

Geography may have a bit to do with that as well. For some. The wife and I two years ago lived in Philadelphia and made a collective $10 an hour more than we do now living down south, to do basically the exact same jobs. Thats a lot of stinking money.

We thought we'd be able to manage the difference and work it out when we decided to move, but I think we're both a little miffed we didn't stay north a year or two more and get things paid off better before moving. If I was still in Philadelphia, I'm certain I'd be more optimistic about that headline.

    Reply#10 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 9:38 AM EST
    SCTexan

    Currently 30% of people who are eligible for a 401k, do not save using one. In most cases those 401ks include a contribution by the employer. That is walking away from free money. If you put in $5 and the business puts in $5, you are waling away from a 100% return on your money even if you put the savings in a government bond paying some minuscule return. In many cases, the amount you would put in to a 401k, would lower your tax liability as much or nearly as much as what you'd be saving, in other words, your take home pay would change very little, if at all.

    • 3 votes
    Reply#11 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:03 AM EST
    JEFFINVA

    Currently 30% of people who are eligible for a 401k, do not save using one. In most cases those 401ks include a contribution by the employer. That is walking away from free money. If you put in $5 and the business puts in $5, you are waling away from a 100% return on your money even if you put the savings in a government bond paying some minuscule return.

    BUT some of those who didn't open a 401k also didn't take a 40% loss when the market tanked. It will happen again without a doubt and I don't want to be investing a bunch of money for my retirement and then lose 40% of it right before my retirement without enough time to gain back what I lost. Also I only wish corporate matching would match a 401k dollar for dollar hell I'd be happy if they just matched $0.75 to the dollar but that is few and far between. A 401k isn't the only way you can save for retirement. In fact I have never participated in the 401k because I don't like others doing group investments with my money. I like to be able to control what my money is invested in and not some catch all low return stock. You're better off investing on your own, choosing multiple risk level stocks, diversifying, and also get an IRA or 2 to pad any possible losses you might have to deal with along the way. A 401k is a good start to investing if you aren't the investment type but if you follow the market or have good advice about investments you would probably do better without it. Hey you can always diversify and get a 401k going if it bothers you to not have one but most companies now have such a low match rate that you might as well save it all by yourself.

    • 1 vote
    #11.1 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:20 PM EST
    SCTexan

    BUT some of those who didn't open a 401k also didn't take a 40% loss when the market tanked. It will happen again without a doubt and I don't want to be investing a bunch of money for my retirement and then lose 40% of it right before my retirement without enough time to gain back what I lost.

    That's a totally false argument, for most. You do not have to invest in the stock market unless you want to. You can invest, in most plans, 100% in government bonds. Your money is as safe as the government but the return is often very low. So you get to choose.

    Also I only wish corporate matching would match a 401k dollar for dollar hell I'd be happy if they just matched $0.75 to the dollar

    I've worked for some that only match 66% of what you put in, but from your stand point, it's still free money, instant growth in your nest egg.

    I like to be able to control what my money is invested

    I understand that for a few, they don't really have options, in that case, use the 401k, then when legal, move it to your own IRA. No penalties, and you can control it.

    • 1 vote
    #11.2 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 12:52 PM EST
    JEFFINVA

    That's a totally false argument, for most.

    Exactly. for most, not all.

    • 1 vote
    #11.3 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 2:29 PM EST
    SCTexan

    My point in saying "for most", comes down to your last point. But it is legal to move your money out of a company controlled 401k and into a personal IRA, I think it's after 3 years. So if you keep doing that, then you have the control after the initial 3 years.

    But then again, it may have just been an option in my plans.

    • 1 vote
    #11.4 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 2:57 PM EST
    Reply
    rog-876531

    That goes way back to Nixon keep people poor and under payed and in debt to the corperate world . We are there money slaves

    • 3 votes
    Reply#12 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:57 AM EST
    mountainfirefall

    break out

    find a new way

    think about tomorrow

    but use a few old dog tricks

    garden

    learn to be your own shaman

    print some of those 'how to's' for an internetless day

    and keep a kettle of soup on

    you never know who might need a bowl

    in the future... its good to make friends:0

    • 3 votes
    Reply#13 - Mon Feb 6, 2012 10:25 PM EST
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com